On August 3, 2009, E&L and Atlantic Paving obtained a zoning permit to operate a paving company and contractor's yard. The land straddles an industrial zone, a commercial zone, and a residential zone. In 2009, Bruno rented the property to Greico, Rosario, and their respective contracting companies. Bruno purchased the property in the 1960s to operate an asphalt paving business, E&L Paving, Inc., and he leased the property to other contractors throughout the years. ![]() Private defendants owned an adjacent lot. Plaintiff has owned property in Long Branch since 1995 and has used the property as an office, a lab, for light manufacturing, and rental space. ![]() Plaintiff also appeals from trial court orders vacating defaults against certain defendants and from a Jorder memorializing a jury verdict entered in favor of defendants Edward Bruno, E&L Paving, Inc., Ray Greico, Atlantic Paving and Coating, LLC, Joe Rosario, Rosario Contracting Corp., Rosario Mazza Demolition and Recycling Co., and Custom Lawn Sprinkler Co., LLC ("private defendants"). Asarnow appeals from an Octoorder granting summary judgment in favor of defendants City of Long Branch and public officials Adam Schneider, Mary Jane Celli, Howard Woolley, Kevin Hayes, Michelle Bernich, Terry Janeczek, Michael Irene, and Long Branch Zoning Board of Adjustment ("Zoning Board"), ("public defendants"). Edinger, attorney for respondents Edward Bruno and E&L Paving, Inc., Ray Greico and Atlantic Paving (& Coating), LLC, Joe Rosario and Rosario Contracting Corp., and Custom Lawn Sprinkler Co., LLC. Hegge & Confusione, LLC, attorneys for appellant (Michael Confusione, of counsel and on the brief).Īnsell, Grimm & Aaron, PC, attorneys for respondents City of Long Branch, Adam Schneider, Mary Jane Celli, Howard Woolley, Kevin Hayes, Michelle Bernich, Terry Janeczek, Michael Irene and Zoning Board of Adjustment (Barry M. On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Monmouth County, Docket No. R.1:36-3.īefore Judges Sabatino, Nugent, and Currier. ![]() This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |